In a speech at the Crypto Task Force Roundtable on Financial Surveillance and Privacy in Washington, SEC chair Paul S. Atkins raised concerns about the expanding scope of regulatory data collection. He warned that poorly designed crypto regulation could entrench mass financial surveillance, weakening both investor privacy and market integrity.
Atkins framed the issue as a fundamental question for modern regulation: whether people can participate in financial markets without giving up their privacy. He described this balance – between national security obligations under frameworks such as the Bank Secrecy Act and what he called a core American value – as central to the future of U.S. financial regulation.
Reviewing the SEC’s Own Approach
Atkins began by examining the SEC’s existing data infrastructure. He acknowledged that the Commission has contributed to the growth of financial surveillance through tools such as the Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT), swap data repositories and Form PF. While these were introduced to protect investors and detect market abuse, he argued that they have expanded beyond their original purpose.
He warned that the federal government’s growing demand for data increases compliance costs and risks to investor liberty, while delivering limited benefit when much of the information collected is not fully used.
The CAT featured prominently in his remarks. Created to provide a clearer view of trading activity, Atkins said it has evolved into a system that moved the SEC closer to mass surveillance. He noted that the Commission has taken steps to scale back sensitive data elements and re-examine both the scope and cost of the programme.
Crypto as a Regulatory Stress Test
Atkins described crypto as a “forcing function” that exposes long-standing regulatory assumptions. While often viewed as privacy-enhancing, public blockchains are, in his words, more transparent than any legacy financial system. Transactions are permanently recorded, and analytics firms already help law enforcement link on-chain activity to real-world identities.
If regulators respond by treating every wallet as a broker and every transaction as reportable, Atkins warned that crypto could become the most extensive financial surveillance system ever created: a “financial panopticon”.
Privacy and Compliance Are Not Opposites
Atkins was clear that regulation and privacy do not need to conflict. He pointed to technologies such as zero-knowledge proofs, selective disclosure and advanced wallet design as ways firms could demonstrate compliance without handing over complete transaction histories or personal data.
This approach would imply a shift away from bulk data collection towards more targeted, outcome-based supervision, reducing data retention risk while still meeting regulatory expectations.
Implications for Regulatory Policy
Atkins concluded by urging regulators to ensure that lawful activity does not automatically attract suspicion. “Shielding the lawful activity of our citizens from bulk surveillance while still ensuring that our government can perform these essential functions is the best way to protect both national security and our basic civil liberties,” he said.
While careful to note that his views were his own, the speech suggests a more restrained regulatory philosophy, one that questions data maximisation as a default compliance strategy and calls for proportionality in crypto oversight.
Wondering How Changing Rules Could Impact Your Firm?
Explore how our automated regulatory intelligence solutions can support your organisation as crypto oversight continues to take shape. Contact our team today.